Hey idk about DEW but controlled demolitions for sure. No doubt about it.
The reasons are certainly as you listed, but I'd go a step further. It was to unite the world using anti-terror and counter-insurgency doctrine, but these had limitations, because the narrative could not be controlled and not enough people were fooled.
So health had to become the way to unite the world, and warfare went from the 5th to the 6th Generation.
Directed energy weapons is the only plausible explanation that also satisfies the lack of Richter/magnitude scale readings indicative of the explosions/explosive charges that would be required to bring a large building down (let alone three, and five total). The Seattle Kingdome is a good comparison, which measured 2.6 on that scale the day it was demolished. The largest Richter/magnitude reading the day of the destruction of much larger WTC buildings was 0.6. Thermite is a red herring/distraction created by the CIA controlled opposition narratives of the "9-11 Truth" movement, to keep the realities and capabilities of directed energy weapons secret.
I do think they used conventional explosives... you can see the squibs popping out... and I do think there was nano-thermite that was sprayed on during the re-fireproofing in the impact zone the prior year. I think they cooked off the nano-thermite to cause the collapse without explosives, used the collapse initiation to drop the building, and DEW weapons to pulverize in mid-air. I think the conventional demo and DEW were redundant to ensure getting the job done and making sure it fell without evidence.
As an engineer I can confirm that any project above general service or production support level receives redundancy. Anything critically important receives minimum double redundancy with defense in depth measures in place. Guaranteed that you will get the final result that was specified.
I've been thinking this same scenario for a while now. Why would those who brought about the demise of the original WTC complex only use one option to destroy it? If I was them, I would use multiple means to see it all destroyed, no way Americans at that time support another war with the towers still standing. And a number of people are connecting the DEW weapons to events after 9/11 such as some wildfires and the horrible fire in Hawaii
It is wonderful that more and more people are waking up to the realities of the CIA/Mossad operation of 9-11. But the biggest question that needs to be asked is, where did the towers go? For firefighters standing in the lobby of one of the towers to have survived the "collapse", to then say they could see blue sky above them dictates that there was not a collapse upon them. For cleanup crews immediately after 9-11 to report that there were no toilets, file cabinets, nothing that filled these buildings, amongst the whatever was left also implies something far more destructive than explosives. The biggest problem with 9-11 narratives is people making hypothesis and then sifting through whatever evidence they can to fit that narrative, while discarding inconvenient evidence that contradict their theory. It is simply not logical to believe that the amount of "dust" that day can be explained with explosives. Show me any use of explosives historically where the overwhelming amount of material left after the explosion is dust. Specifically, the amount of dust/lack of material to the extent that people standing in the lobby of one of those buildings after those events could see the sky above them.? In all other controlled demolitions previously to that day, the amount of material left over after the demolition is roughly 30% the height of the original building. This makes sense considering the material that comprised a building before the demolition. But even then, a demolitioned building is gutted before it is destroyed (the WTC buildings were not). So where did the towers go, along with everything that was in them? How much thermite would have had to have been used to turn almost EVERYTHING to dust? That addresses the Forbes comment (I am not sure Forbes is a safe place to stand in finding truth). Regardless, the Forbes number is less than the Kingdome. Etienne does reference Judy Wood's work in the notes to this write up, but her work is the only one (along with those that utilize her work) that seek to only address the facts and evidence to then paint the picture, instead of the tactic of the "Truth" movement of concocting a sorry and then only using some of the evidence to justify that narrative. By the way, the BYU (my alma mater) professor who conveniently proved thermite was in the dust (deceptively), previous to his time at BYU worked for top secret government research project on... Energy. Do you think that is germane l? In my opinion, the one piece of evidence that is the most damning, and most informative is the footage of the 90 foot steel radio antenna magically turning to dust as the building beneath it starts to disappear also (https://app.box.com/s/eokngfvjfksb07ez5nqfxl0lye38s35y). https://911revision.substack.com/p/decoding-codex-911?utm_source=post-banner&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=true
Do you have a reference/link for the story of the firefighter who allegedly survived the collapse and claimed they saw blue sky instead of falling rubble? This is new to me.
Was there in fact far less than 30% of building material? Was this before or after the cleanup began?
Do you have a link to the cleanup crew alleging there were zero toilets, file cabinets, or anything else at all? This is new to me.
Do you have a link showing the BYU professor was the person who collected dust samples and alleged they contain thermite, and any which claim he worked on top secret energy projects? This is new to me. Top Secret classification implies this knowledge would not be public, so I'm curious how this became known.
Sofia Smallstorm made a documentary called 9/11 Mysteries. She had a lot of excellent information about how the steel beams were cut with thermite at a 45 degree angle prior to the building collapse. That’s to the best of my recollection. She showed her documentary at a local theatre and one of my best friends was friends with her for a while, after the 9/11 event was being heavily scrutinized.
Ok well, I am not going to download the file at that app box link but I will check out this other substack article later.
I'm skeptical because 9/11 makes enough sense with more natural explanations, and talk of knowing top secret projects that can bever be confirmed, and directed energy weapons, can itself derail the truth movement.
This sounds like limited hangout to hide the real method for the WTC attack. The airplanes didn’t do it. And there were no controlled demolitions. The WTC towers, as the article actually does admit, fell in a manner that defied known physics. The stellar work of Professor Judy Wood can be accessed in her engineering textbook quality volume “Where Did the Towers Go.” Once you watch the 9/11 footage with Dr. Wood’s commentary you cannot unsee what really happened.
Fun fact: In order to effect an explosive demolition, the rate of chemical expansion for the explosive substance must exceed the speed of sound through the material to be demolished. Engineers know this. Military ordnance experts know this. But whoever concocted the phony “thermite paint” fairy tale didn’t. Thermite is too slow acting to cause an explosive concrete and steel demolition.
According to Prof. Judy Wood’s thorough academic research, only one other record of a steel framed high rise disintegrating in the mysterious “dustification” manner as the WTC. In Iran. Can’t make a correlation, let alone a theory, on the parallel. But it’s damned interesting.
I don't think they did it to the whole building.. just the impact area to set off a gravity collapse by weakening / destroying a couple of floors... then you get a gravity collapse without squibs... then the falling debris from the top section covers the squibs and DEW system... It's just a theory BUT there is enough evidence for controlled demolition, prior knowledge, intelligence agency, FBI and military involvement, etc. that we don't have to have every aspect perfect
The top 80% of the WTC towers 1 & 2 were “dustified.” The debris left on the ground after the “collapses” only accounts for about 20% of the mass of the structures. Photographs of the site after the towers dropped bear this out.
**The only things I didn't see in this video were:
1) the supershort clip of an alt media person catching john Kerry in a stairwell admitting that 9/11 was a conspiracy 30 years in the planning.
2) Dr. Judy Wood's evidence for a directed energy weapon being used to destroy WTC 1 & 2.
3) The dual radar tracks heading into both WTC 1 & 2 indicating that the entire show people were watching from the ground was a hologram. This is supported by Fire Chief, Orrio Palmer, who made it to the impact site on WTC 1. In Mr. Palmer's recorded voice (in Codex 9/11) clearly states, that all he found was two fires that could be put down by "a couple of lines." He said this while on the outside, everyone was watching huge gaping 80' holes with massive explosions in multiple sides of the building.
Mr. Zerbo got everything else - and that was a real piece of work!!
After this morning, I agree. I went back and looked at the Dr. Judy Woods information and that really needed to be in there.
I've never done this before, but to commemorate this horrific attack on the American people by the US Dept of Defense, I used today's Global Research.ca e-mail /article collection... and forwarded it with these links:
"Subject: 9/11 REAL LINKS // "Codex 9/11" Commemorating the 24th Anniversary of 9/11. What Is the Truth?
As Mr. Zerbo says, "... few (uS government orchestrated) false flag events have fared as badly over time as 9/11."
****************
A Warm Up - TheCorbettReport.com (James Corbett) Slays united States government 9/11 in 5 minutes.
1) The supershort clip of an alt media person catching John Kerry (former Secretary of State, and more) in a stairwell admitting that 9/11 was a conspiracy 30 years in the planning.
2) Dr. Judy Wood's evidence/book: Where Did The Towers Go? for a directed energy weapon being used to destroy WTC 1 & 2, and what happened to her lawsuit when the rest of the "truther" community ignored her.
3) The dual radar tracks heading into both WTC 1 & 2 indicating that the entire show people were watching from the ground was a hologram. This is supported in "Codex 9/11" by Fire Chief, Orrio Palmer, who made it to the impact site on WTC 1. In Mr. Palmer's recorded voice (in Codex 9/11) clearly states, that all he found was two fires that could be put down by "a couple of lines." He said this while outside, everyone was watching huge gaping 80' holes with massive explosions in multiple sides of the building.]
*****************
Episode 308 – 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money by TheCorbettReport.com Sep 11, 2015
I didn't realize that the 9/11 fightback was fractured into three groups. I am really done with this whole divide and conquer routine. Everyone deserves a listen.
Thank you for that link!! I will listen to it. I also think your observation could be applied to almost any of the "big" fight back issues.
Anti-Geoengineering split between those who do not appreciate Dane Wigington's theft of $75K from producer Michael Murphy back in the beginning, and those who don't know anything about it.
I'm not close enough to the top fighters in the stop Electro Magnetic Radiation movement, but their efforts are spread across so many organizations, it's hard not to wonder why?
Greenpeace, PETA, ACLU, Intl Union for the Conservation of Nature, Food & Water Watch, Mother Jones, FracTracker Alliance, and so many more 'left' organizations that used to have effective strategies - are now visibly handled. Many of their most effective methods now missing, they make their own information unavailable, provide non-working maps, have worthless, un-informative websites, do expensive direct mail campaigns over and over to feed their ineffective beats.... so now all they do is suck resources out of the fight back and waste any newcomer's time for a few years.
It only takes one person to derail an organization. At the US Dept of Agriculture, I read an article about how one revolving door professional was able to stop the investigation into glyphosphate toxicity fof 5 years. Her legacy continues in spite of multi-billion dollar court cases, and a nation full of sick people.
Remember BP's Deep Horizon oil spill? There was a woman who sequentially worked in two small local environmental activist organizations who was on a big corporate payroll. I think it was a contractor to BP and not BP directly. She was finally outed and the environmental fight back community on the Gulf of Mexico coast knows who she is - for now. But she thwarted the actions and policy of two environmental organizations all by herself.
It all takes me back to Dr. Margaret Stoat's books on psychopathy. I've stopped asking myself how someone could do something so heinous. I think I know now. These people are part of Dr. Stoat's 13.5 million (epidemic level) fucking psychopaths in the USA just looking for entertainment and a pay off. That's who the real enemy is.
And I am with you 100% on the "stand down psy ops." QFS, Nesara, Q, Operation Truth, an imminent "convergence" of energy fields, and on and on.
If someone tells me they give these things credence, I know now to walk away. They need the delusion for emotional survival. I just tell them that I too, would love to believe that there is a happy ending right around the corner - but I know too much to fall for it.
The planes most likely landed at Westover in MA. Calls were made from there. How were the people killed? Planes went to the graveyard out West? Did CIA incinerate the bodies?
Two words: Judy Wood
Hey idk about DEW but controlled demolitions for sure. No doubt about it.
The reasons are certainly as you listed, but I'd go a step further. It was to unite the world using anti-terror and counter-insurgency doctrine, but these had limitations, because the narrative could not be controlled and not enough people were fooled.
So health had to become the way to unite the world, and warfare went from the 5th to the 6th Generation.
Directed energy weapons is the only plausible explanation that also satisfies the lack of Richter/magnitude scale readings indicative of the explosions/explosive charges that would be required to bring a large building down (let alone three, and five total). The Seattle Kingdome is a good comparison, which measured 2.6 on that scale the day it was demolished. The largest Richter/magnitude reading the day of the destruction of much larger WTC buildings was 0.6. Thermite is a red herring/distraction created by the CIA controlled opposition narratives of the "9-11 Truth" movement, to keep the realities and capabilities of directed energy weapons secret.
I do think they used conventional explosives... you can see the squibs popping out... and I do think there was nano-thermite that was sprayed on during the re-fireproofing in the impact zone the prior year. I think they cooked off the nano-thermite to cause the collapse without explosives, used the collapse initiation to drop the building, and DEW weapons to pulverize in mid-air. I think the conventional demo and DEW were redundant to ensure getting the job done and making sure it fell without evidence.
As an engineer I can confirm that any project above general service or production support level receives redundancy. Anything critically important receives minimum double redundancy with defense in depth measures in place. Guaranteed that you will get the final result that was specified.
Redundancy makes a lot of sense. They wanted to make sure the job got done.
I've been thinking this same scenario for a while now. Why would those who brought about the demise of the original WTC complex only use one option to destroy it? If I was them, I would use multiple means to see it all destroyed, no way Americans at that time support another war with the towers still standing. And a number of people are connecting the DEW weapons to events after 9/11 such as some wildfires and the horrible fire in Hawaii
Forbes says the south tower had 2.1 and the north had 2.3, as measured by 13 stations around new york.
So perhaps that fits a controlled demolition after all when comparing it to the Kingdome.
Perhaps thermite was used since it was found in fine dust samples collected and analyzed by a private party, allegedly.
Perhaps turning the rubble to dust would have limited what might have been a stronger richter scale reading.
It is wonderful that more and more people are waking up to the realities of the CIA/Mossad operation of 9-11. But the biggest question that needs to be asked is, where did the towers go? For firefighters standing in the lobby of one of the towers to have survived the "collapse", to then say they could see blue sky above them dictates that there was not a collapse upon them. For cleanup crews immediately after 9-11 to report that there were no toilets, file cabinets, nothing that filled these buildings, amongst the whatever was left also implies something far more destructive than explosives. The biggest problem with 9-11 narratives is people making hypothesis and then sifting through whatever evidence they can to fit that narrative, while discarding inconvenient evidence that contradict their theory. It is simply not logical to believe that the amount of "dust" that day can be explained with explosives. Show me any use of explosives historically where the overwhelming amount of material left after the explosion is dust. Specifically, the amount of dust/lack of material to the extent that people standing in the lobby of one of those buildings after those events could see the sky above them.? In all other controlled demolitions previously to that day, the amount of material left over after the demolition is roughly 30% the height of the original building. This makes sense considering the material that comprised a building before the demolition. But even then, a demolitioned building is gutted before it is destroyed (the WTC buildings were not). So where did the towers go, along with everything that was in them? How much thermite would have had to have been used to turn almost EVERYTHING to dust? That addresses the Forbes comment (I am not sure Forbes is a safe place to stand in finding truth). Regardless, the Forbes number is less than the Kingdome. Etienne does reference Judy Wood's work in the notes to this write up, but her work is the only one (along with those that utilize her work) that seek to only address the facts and evidence to then paint the picture, instead of the tactic of the "Truth" movement of concocting a sorry and then only using some of the evidence to justify that narrative. By the way, the BYU (my alma mater) professor who conveniently proved thermite was in the dust (deceptively), previous to his time at BYU worked for top secret government research project on... Energy. Do you think that is germane l? In my opinion, the one piece of evidence that is the most damning, and most informative is the footage of the 90 foot steel radio antenna magically turning to dust as the building beneath it starts to disappear also (https://app.box.com/s/eokngfvjfksb07ez5nqfxl0lye38s35y). https://911revision.substack.com/p/decoding-codex-911?utm_source=post-banner&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=true
Do you have a reference/link for the story of the firefighter who allegedly survived the collapse and claimed they saw blue sky instead of falling rubble? This is new to me.
Was there in fact far less than 30% of building material? Was this before or after the cleanup began?
Do you have a link to the cleanup crew alleging there were zero toilets, file cabinets, or anything else at all? This is new to me.
Do you have a link showing the BYU professor was the person who collected dust samples and alleged they contain thermite, and any which claim he worked on top secret energy projects? This is new to me. Top Secret classification implies this knowledge would not be public, so I'm curious how this became known.
YouTube survivors of staircase B. On there record.
The amounts rubble is minimal for the material in the building. It reached to lobby level. Peter Jennings and George Stephanopoulous reports about it here. https://youtu.be/AFn5h5D0950?feature=shared and on repeat here https://youtu.be/xiKG6-SU7lY?feature=shared
Judy Wood reports on the absence of hard materials like bathroom fixtures and filing cabinets.
She also reports about the toasted cars in a near parking lot, while other vehicles are completely unscathed.
Don’t know about the thermite. Think that’s part of the redundancy that the author of this post states above.
Sofia Smallstorm made a documentary called 9/11 Mysteries. She had a lot of excellent information about how the steel beams were cut with thermite at a 45 degree angle prior to the building collapse. That’s to the best of my recollection. She showed her documentary at a local theatre and one of my best friends was friends with her for a while, after the 9/11 event was being heavily scrutinized.
https://911revision.substack.com/p/decoding-codex-911?utm_source=post-banner&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=true
Ok well, I am not going to download the file at that app box link but I will check out this other substack article later.
I'm skeptical because 9/11 makes enough sense with more natural explanations, and talk of knowing top secret projects that can bever be confirmed, and directed energy weapons, can itself derail the truth movement.
YouTube survivors of staircase B. The firefighter Jay Jonas is the one who said it.
The amounts rubble is minimal for the material in the building. It reached to lobby level. Peter Jennings and George Stephanopoulous reports about it here. https://youtu.be/AFn5h5D0950?feature=shared and on repeat here https://youtu.be/xiKG6-SU7lY?feature=shared
The bathtub was intact, meaning all the supposed rubble did not slam into the ground below street level.
Judy Wood reports on the absence of hard materials like bathroom fixtures and filing cabinets.
She also reports about the toasted cars in a near parking lot, while other vehicles are completely unscathed.
Don’t know about the thermite. Think that’s part of the redundancy that the author of this post states above.
This sounds like limited hangout to hide the real method for the WTC attack. The airplanes didn’t do it. And there were no controlled demolitions. The WTC towers, as the article actually does admit, fell in a manner that defied known physics. The stellar work of Professor Judy Wood can be accessed in her engineering textbook quality volume “Where Did the Towers Go.” Once you watch the 9/11 footage with Dr. Wood’s commentary you cannot unsee what really happened.
Exactly. We have seen the effects of these weapons since - Paradise, Lahaina, North Carolina. Thank you.
Fun fact: In order to effect an explosive demolition, the rate of chemical expansion for the explosive substance must exceed the speed of sound through the material to be demolished. Engineers know this. Military ordnance experts know this. But whoever concocted the phony “thermite paint” fairy tale didn’t. Thermite is too slow acting to cause an explosive concrete and steel demolition.
According to Prof. Judy Wood’s thorough academic research, only one other record of a steel framed high rise disintegrating in the mysterious “dustification” manner as the WTC. In Iran. Can’t make a correlation, let alone a theory, on the parallel. But it’s damned interesting.
I don't think they did it to the whole building.. just the impact area to set off a gravity collapse by weakening / destroying a couple of floors... then you get a gravity collapse without squibs... then the falling debris from the top section covers the squibs and DEW system... It's just a theory BUT there is enough evidence for controlled demolition, prior knowledge, intelligence agency, FBI and military involvement, etc. that we don't have to have every aspect perfect
The top 80% of the WTC towers 1 & 2 were “dustified.” The debris left on the ground after the “collapses” only accounts for about 20% of the mass of the structures. Photographs of the site after the towers dropped bear this out.
Never forget, your Israeli government wants you dead!
Too bad we are slowly and surely exposing their organized crime operation and deprogramming their mind controlled religious fanatics!
https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood. Worthwhile and thought-provoking.
Excellent work!
Decoding "CODEX 9/11"
A great wake up call for normies, but lacking in research diligence for seasoned researchers. A great opportunity wasted.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/decoding-codex-911
Tower 7 is a proof of the lies.
Pentagon missile is another proof.
The insurance by lucky Larry
The absence of lucky Larry .
The asbestos on the tower I beams
The mount of debris doesn't equal 2x100 stories towers.
The rush to dispose of the evidences.
The reluctant Bush to investigate?
That was great. I will be sending it out as a commemorative e-mail with the hilarious 5 min blast from The Corbett Report.
08/24/2025 Brad Zerbo's 2.5 hour video systematically rips the lid off of the official 9/11 Government and Media Narrative.
************************
"CODEX 9/11"
https://rumble.com/v6xtnzu-codex-911-premiering-aug-24th-6pm-et.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlwycIbN7FM
**The only things I didn't see in this video were:
1) the supershort clip of an alt media person catching john Kerry in a stairwell admitting that 9/11 was a conspiracy 30 years in the planning.
2) Dr. Judy Wood's evidence for a directed energy weapon being used to destroy WTC 1 & 2.
3) The dual radar tracks heading into both WTC 1 & 2 indicating that the entire show people were watching from the ground was a hologram. This is supported by Fire Chief, Orrio Palmer, who made it to the impact site on WTC 1. In Mr. Palmer's recorded voice (in Codex 9/11) clearly states, that all he found was two fires that could be put down by "a couple of lines." He said this while on the outside, everyone was watching huge gaping 80' holes with massive explosions in multiple sides of the building.
Mr. Zerbo got everything else - and that was a real piece of work!!
Decoding "CODEX 9/11"
A great wake up call for normies, but lacking in research diligence for seasoned researchers. A great opportunity wasted.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/decoding-codex-911
After this morning, I agree. I went back and looked at the Dr. Judy Woods information and that really needed to be in there.
I've never done this before, but to commemorate this horrific attack on the American people by the US Dept of Defense, I used today's Global Research.ca e-mail /article collection... and forwarded it with these links:
"Subject: 9/11 REAL LINKS // "Codex 9/11" Commemorating the 24th Anniversary of 9/11. What Is the Truth?
As Mr. Zerbo says, "... few (uS government orchestrated) false flag events have fared as badly over time as 9/11."
****************
A Warm Up - TheCorbettReport.com (James Corbett) Slays united States government 9/11 in 5 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3YTrU2eARo
****************
08/24/2025 Brad Zerbo's 2.5 hour video systematically rips the lid off of the official 9/11 Government and Media Narrative with "CODEX 9/11"
https://rumble.com/v6xtnzu-codex-911-premiering-aug-24th-6pm-et.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlwycIbN7FM [Compiler's Note: The only items I didn't see in this video were:
1) The supershort clip of an alt media person catching John Kerry (former Secretary of State, and more) in a stairwell admitting that 9/11 was a conspiracy 30 years in the planning.
2) Dr. Judy Wood's evidence/book: Where Did The Towers Go? for a directed energy weapon being used to destroy WTC 1 & 2, and what happened to her lawsuit when the rest of the "truther" community ignored her.
3) The dual radar tracks heading into both WTC 1 & 2 indicating that the entire show people were watching from the ground was a hologram. This is supported in "Codex 9/11" by Fire Chief, Orrio Palmer, who made it to the impact site on WTC 1. In Mr. Palmer's recorded voice (in Codex 9/11) clearly states, that all he found was two fires that could be put down by "a couple of lines." He said this while outside, everyone was watching huge gaping 80' holes with massive explosions in multiple sides of the building.]
*****************
Episode 308 – 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money by TheCorbettReport.com Sep 11, 2015
https://corbettreport.com/episode-308-911-trillions-follow-the-money/
*****************
Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades
https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-100-day-fuming-and-molecular
*****************
9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuCrY4trS8N1/
****************
David Hughes on the importance of 9/11 revisionism and why evidence matters - A critical look at the three camps of 9/11 truth awareness (link does work; cut and paste:) https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-hughes-on-the-importance-of
* * *
The Most Basic, Super Simple Question: And how much more will we (you and me) tolerate?
Now is the time to exit the system to whatever degree possible.
The Great Taking and the Going Direct Reset are right around the corner..."
*******************************************************************
I didn't realize that the 9/11 fightback was fractured into three groups. I am really done with this whole divide and conquer routine. Everyone deserves a listen.
You need to know the history of truth suppression regarding 9/11 that is DOCUMENTED since 2005 - Read this.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Thank you for that link!! I will listen to it. I also think your observation could be applied to almost any of the "big" fight back issues.
Anti-Geoengineering split between those who do not appreciate Dane Wigington's theft of $75K from producer Michael Murphy back in the beginning, and those who don't know anything about it.
I'm not close enough to the top fighters in the stop Electro Magnetic Radiation movement, but their efforts are spread across so many organizations, it's hard not to wonder why?
Greenpeace, PETA, ACLU, Intl Union for the Conservation of Nature, Food & Water Watch, Mother Jones, FracTracker Alliance, and so many more 'left' organizations that used to have effective strategies - are now visibly handled. Many of their most effective methods now missing, they make their own information unavailable, provide non-working maps, have worthless, un-informative websites, do expensive direct mail campaigns over and over to feed their ineffective beats.... so now all they do is suck resources out of the fight back and waste any newcomer's time for a few years.
It only takes one person to derail an organization. At the US Dept of Agriculture, I read an article about how one revolving door professional was able to stop the investigation into glyphosphate toxicity fof 5 years. Her legacy continues in spite of multi-billion dollar court cases, and a nation full of sick people.
Remember BP's Deep Horizon oil spill? There was a woman who sequentially worked in two small local environmental activist organizations who was on a big corporate payroll. I think it was a contractor to BP and not BP directly. She was finally outed and the environmental fight back community on the Gulf of Mexico coast knows who she is - for now. But she thwarted the actions and policy of two environmental organizations all by herself.
It all takes me back to Dr. Margaret Stoat's books on psychopathy. I've stopped asking myself how someone could do something so heinous. I think I know now. These people are part of Dr. Stoat's 13.5 million (epidemic level) fucking psychopaths in the USA just looking for entertainment and a pay off. That's who the real enemy is.
Give these articles of mine a work through.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
The 9/11 TRUTH vs Stand-Down PSY-OPS
Make people believe that someone or some group external to themselves is going to "save" or "rescue" them
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-truth-vs-stand-down-psy-ops
Thank you for that. I certainly will.
And I am with you 100% on the "stand down psy ops." QFS, Nesara, Q, Operation Truth, an imminent "convergence" of energy fields, and on and on.
If someone tells me they give these things credence, I know now to walk away. They need the delusion for emotional survival. I just tell them that I too, would love to believe that there is a happy ending right around the corner - but I know too much to fall for it.
Excellent work sir, in keeping with your previous detailed expose'. I would expect no less from you, well done!
Thank you!
This one definitely looks worth watching
Welcome to the party! I am about to send you my homework assignment...
Decoding "CODEX 9/11"
A great wake up call for normies, but lacking in research diligence for seasoned researchers. A great opportunity wasted.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/decoding-codex-911
So big question is, where are all those passengers who died in the plane crash ?
If they used the drone then those passengers should be alive . Those passengers had families .
If they didn’t die then they would be found !
No one has come up with an answer on that .
Yes my thought too?? All made up people?
Why do you assume they'd be alive?
The planes most likely landed at Westover in MA. Calls were made from there. How were the people killed? Planes went to the graveyard out West? Did CIA incinerate the bodies?
The guy who found the planes was murderer along with children!
Murdered
I think James Corbett had it right from the get go.
The Martians did it.
Put Charlie Kirk’s assassination into the context laid out in this documentary.
It's past time to stop the jews.