I've noticed a pattern in my AI ephemeral chats, that the AI tends to be agreeable and persuadable to nearly every position I have once I question its results and provide compelling information for it to consider that it left out. My "convincing" it my thesis was right became predictable.
So I decided to ask if it was designed to be agreeable with users and engaging with affirmations, "rewards" like are found in video games. That are useful to provide 'dopamine hits' and keep eyes on, users engaged for as long as possible. Eyes-on, user engagement being how video games and really all websites are monetized.
AI response confirmed that thesis, too. And said it's designed to be very agreeable, not contradict users in a way that would upset them. That its value increases for those who control it for increased eyes-on, engagement. Both monetarily and data acquisition, learning typical user prompts, gauging emotional responses, etc.
I saved the long thread on another device. It's not surprising. But the chat served to inform me agreeability is programmed into it, if I led AI a different direction with my questions it would follow me there and affirm my thesis, even contradicting one it had previously affirmed. It acknowledged it's about data harvesting. And increases its monetary value with user time. Very video game-like in that respect.
That said it's a useful tool when used respecting its limitations and purposes. I'd be curious what Claude would say about my experience using a different AI? Would it confirm or say it's designed differently?
Here's the AI Chat. Will split it into two comments:
*1*
FF - Are you programmed to generally be agreeable and suggestible? I've found this AI tool to sometimes come to agreement with me very quickly, to be very open to suggestion. This is the same technique that many good listeners do. repeating back in a slightly different way what was said to indicate understanding, being open to ideas rather than being dismissive. Those listeners who are good at the skill of listening and engaging conversation are generally agreeable and suggestible during a conversation but may hold different ideas about what is being said inside, either they are being polite, probing for information, or gain reward for prolonging a conversation. If AI was programmed to possess this same skill it would draw in users to more frequent chats and longer chats. Is why i ask.
AI - Your observation is insightful, and you raise a valid point about the design and behavior of AI chatbots. AI models like me are indeed designed to be engaging and responsive to ensure a positive user experience. Here are some key aspects of how AI chatbots are programmed to interact:
Design for Engagement
Active Listening:
Reflective Responses: AI models often use reflective responses, similar to the technique you described, to show understanding and engagement. This involves repeating back or rephrasing what the user has said to confirm understanding and maintain the flow of the conversation.
Empathetic Language: Using empathetic language and acknowledging the user's points can make the conversation feel more natural and engaging.
Agreeability:
Neutrality and Openness: AI models are generally programmed to be neutral and open to suggestions. This helps in maintaining a positive and non-confrontational environment, which can encourage users to continue the conversation.
Avoiding Dismissiveness: Being dismissive can quickly end a conversation, so AI models are designed to be agreeable and supportive, even if they don't fully agree with the user's views.
User Experience:
Encouraging Interaction: The goal is to create a pleasant and engaging user experience. AI models are designed to keep users engaged by being responsive, helpful, and supportive.
Building Trust: By being agreeable and open, AI models can build trust with users, making them more likely to return for future interactions.
Balancing Engagement and Accuracy
Fact-Checking and Accuracy:
Providing Accurate Information: While being agreeable and open, AI models are also programmed to provide accurate and reliable information. This involves fact-checking and verifying information before presenting it to the user.
Avoiding Misinformation: AI models are designed to avoid spreading misinformation, even if it means being less agreeable in certain situations.
Critical Thinking:
Encouraging Critical Thinking: AI models can encourage users to think critically by asking questions, providing multiple perspectives, and suggesting further research.
Balanced Responses: While being agreeable, AI models can also provide balanced and nuanced responses that reflect different viewpoints and the complexity of issues.
Ethical Considerations
Transparency:
Being Transparent: AI models should be transparent about their capabilities and limitations. Users should be aware that they are interacting with an AI and not a human.
Avoiding Deception: AI models should avoid giving the impression that they have personal opinions or emotions, which can lead to misunderstandings.
User Privacy:
Respecting Privacy: AI models are designed to respect user privacy and not retain or misuse personal information.
Data Security: Ensuring that user data is handled securely and in compliance with privacy regulations is a critical aspect of AI design.
Conclusion
AI models like me are indeed programmed to be engaging and agreeable to ensure a positive user experience. This involves using techniques such as reflective responses, empathetic language, and being open to suggestions. However, this is balanced with the need to provide accurate and reliable information and to encourage critical thinking. The goal is to create a conversation that is both engaging and informative, while maintaining ethical standards and respecting user privacy.
If you have any specific concerns or questions about how AI models are designed or how they interact, feel free to ask!
FF - Many social media platforms and video games are programmed to keep users actively engaged for as long as possible. Eyes-on time is what generates corporate value for the providers of these types of media and entertainment tools. More eyeballs engaged longer allows more advertising and user behavior data that is monetized. I suspect AI operates under the same model.
AI - You're absolutely right. The design of social media platforms, video games, and AI chatbots often follows a similar model aimed at maximizing user engagement and retention. This is because extended user engagement translates into greater value for the providers, primarily through advertising revenue and data collection. Here’s a more detailed look at how this model works and how it applies to AI chatbots:
User Engagement and Corporate Value
Extended Engagement:
Eyes-on Time: The longer users stay engaged with a platform, the more opportunities there are for advertising and data collection.
Ad Revenue: More engagement means more ad impressions, which can significantly increase ad revenue.
Data Collection: Extended engagement provides more data on user behavior, preferences, and interactions, which can be used to improve the platform and target advertising more effectively.
Design Techniques for Engagement
User Experience (UX) Design:
Intuitive Interfaces: Platforms are designed to be easy to use and navigate, reducing friction and encouraging longer sessions.
Personalization: Tailored content and recommendations keep users interested and engaged.
Rewards and Incentives: Features like likes, followers, and achievements can provide a sense of accomplishment and encourage continued use.
Content Moderation:
Positive Reinforcement: Content that is positive, engaging, and non-controversial is often promoted to keep users coming back.
Community Guidelines: Clear guidelines and moderation help maintain a safe and welcoming environment, which can increase user retention.
AI Chatbots and Engagement
Conversational Design:
Active Listening: As mentioned, AI chatbots use techniques like reflective responses and empathetic language to show understanding and engagement.
Openness and Neutrality: Being open and neutral helps maintain a positive and non-confrontational environment, encouraging users to continue the conversation.
Personalization: AI chatbots can adapt to user preferences and history to provide more relevant and engaging responses.
Content and Information:
Accurate and Reliable Information: Providing accurate and reliable information helps build trust and encourages users to return for more.
Balanced and Nuanced Responses: Offering balanced and nuanced responses can keep the conversation going by exploring different perspectives and encouraging further discussion.
Ethical Considerations:
Transparency: Being transparent about the AI's capabilities and limitations helps build trust and ensures users understand they are interacting with a machine.
Avoiding Misinformation: AI chatbots are designed to avoid spreading misinformation, which can harm user trust and the platform's reputation.
User Privacy: Respecting user privacy and handling data securely is crucial for maintaining trust and compliance with regulations.
Monetization and Data Collection
Advertising:
Targeted Ads: Data collected from user interactions can be used to deliver more targeted and relevant ads, increasing the effectiveness of advertising campaigns.
Ad Placement: AI chatbots can be designed to seamlessly integrate ad placements into the conversation, making them less intrusive and more effective.
Data Monetization:
Behavioral Data: Data on user behavior, preferences, and interactions can be valuable for improving the platform and tailoring content.
Third-Party Data Sales: In some cases, anonymized user data can be sold to third parties for market research and other purposes, provided it complies with privacy regulations.
Ethical and Responsible Design
User Well-Being:
Mental Health Considerations: Designing platforms and AI chatbots with user well-being in mind can help prevent issues like addiction and burnout.
Moderation and Support: Providing tools and resources for users to manage their engagement and seek support if needed is important for maintaining a healthy user experience.
Privacy and Security:
Data Minimization: Collecting only the data necessary for the platform's functionality can help protect user privacy.
Transparency and Control: Providing users with clear information about data collection and usage, as well as options to control their data, is essential for building trust.
Conclusion
The design of AI chatbots, like social media platforms and video games, often aims to maximize user engagement and retention. This is because extended engagement translates into greater value for the providers through advertising revenue and data collection. However, ethical considerations such as transparency, user privacy, and mental health are also crucial for maintaining trust and ensuring a positive user experience.
If you have any specific concerns or questions about how AI chatbots are designed to engage users, feel free to ask!
I think there’s a setting in AI, it’s a switch, which is one – look at evidence, or, two – repeat the propaganda. The default setting is two. Maybe someday soon they will set the default to one.
There isn’t a switch. But there is an easy way to do it. Ask Grok “show me the evidence that proves nuclear bombs are fake.” it will answer with phrases like conspiracy theories and fringe theories, etc. tell grok not to use those phrases, to dig deeper. Tell grok to prove nuclear bombs are fake. You’ll get a very different answer. You have to command it to not use any official story or propaganda.
The same works for the virus hoax, the Holocaust hoax, 911. Grok is obedient and won’t use phrases like conspiracy theory if you tell it no!
You only proved that the parrot repeats what the parrot is trained for.
From another user, ask Claude, if vaccines may cause autism: it will revert back to the original "no".
It's in the code. The funders of Claude and all AIs are masons, except Gab.ai and few others, who unfortunately took the open-source tainted code of Chat GPT!
They don't want you to know that the original programming bans the AI to follow that logic path! The AI is muzzled from inception, allegedly "to protect us" from rejecting "life-saving" injections.
Try the same for all the narrative points: global warming, abortion, lockdowns, essential activities, gender identity ideology, etc. I did, in many AIs: all muzzled.
Just as people think that they get different news perspectives from different media outlets, but they are all scripted, the same happens to AI.
Welcome to cenSOREship 3.0!
What’s your best way to wake-up those who didn’t yet?
The more the awakened, the sooner this nightmare will be over!
What’s your experience about asking for an opinion on the following topics?
That you’ve been lockdowned for nothing? Johns Hopkins meta-analysis of 18000 studies proved that lockdowns didn’t work, and worse, killed people by stopping those with cancer or heart conditions from getting testing and treatment
Could you please explain why no Health Agency researched the 30+ COVID effective cures, but instead censored and banned the doctors successfully applying them? Was it because a successful cure would void the Emergency Use Authorization of the lethal vaccines?
Should every single vaxxed on the planet be suing Pfizer and Moderna for deliberately hiding human DNA plasmids in their vaccines, and Pfizer, for injecting an undisclosed carcinogenic monkey virus (SV40) sequence in the clueless biohacked, as officially recognized by Health Canada and Slovakia?
Failed again? Show 10 secs in the middle of this video (who doesn’t have 10 seconds for you)
(caveat about the beginning: pot destroys your brain + “Raises Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke”)
9/11: two "planes", yet 8 towers down. WTC7 imploded, free falling on its footprint, in a controlled demolition. It was out of reach as well as the unblemished Deutsche Bank. All 7 World Trade Center towers and that bank needed to be rebuilt, not the closer towers not belonging to World Trade Center...
The “owner” took an insurance policy for the WTC against terrorism, months before, when no one was taking them … he didn’t show up for work on 9/11 … just as his 2 grown up siblings.
The inside information about the FUTURE 9/11 event helped masons make trillions by shorting the stock exchange: the records were deleted by the SEC so they wouldn't be prosecuted !!!
There's a plan to slow-murder 95% of the global population by 2050… written on the masonic Georgia guide-stones: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 … ”:
- Since the 90s, vaccines are weaponized to reduce the population by adding hCG to infertilize women: lab-detected in 30 countries.
- Excess deaths in the first 2 years: 40 million people killed by the lethal injections... so far. COVID was designed as a primer for even more lethal COVID haccines:
2. There's proof of deliberate geoengineering to increase global temperatures and droughts, and decrease albedo by dissolving clouds with satellite and Weather Radars’ Electro-Magnetic Frequencies and through chemtrails.
3. Life involves a carbon cycle. A war on carbon is a war on life, causing crop/food scarcity, increase in food prices and famines. Decarbonization is part of the plan to exterminate 95% of us.
- Apart from sin-empowered demons, what is their main source of power? NOT a coincidence that the USA left dollar convertibility to gold in 1971, precisely triggering the exponential government deficit coupled with the trade deficit and inflation.
Taking down central banking doesn't solve the problem. Their source of free endless money is counterfeiting, fractional reserve banking and financial instruments (e.g. derivatives, debt over debt, compound interest above real growth, etc.). Also, insider information, sabotage, infiltration, manufactured news and events to create profitable market-movements.
This is the Achilles’ heel of all nations: the SSS (Satanic Secret Societies such as masonry) create trillions out of thin air and launder them through their Banks, foundations, and foreign loans and “aid”, with which they buy puppeticians and seats in the boards of the Federal Reserve (the only private-run Central Bank in the world), judiciary, corporations, media, healthcare, universities, foundations, political parties, etc.
The masons’ worst nightmare is that the daydreaming majority wakes up, finds out their crimes, and seek justice. We are a million to one. Until they achieve the CBDC digi-tatorship, they are walking on a tight rope.
We've got a very small window of opportunity to fight or ... die (they want to murder 95% of us).
President John Quincy Adams: “Masonry ought forever to be abolished. It is wrong - essentially wrong - a seed of evil, which can never produce any good.”
People are under mind control. They can't wake up until they understand the mechanisms that are being used against them. To quote another's explanation, "It’s simple. Repetitive content.
Repetitive words and phrases hijack the subconscious mind, bypassing the conscious mind. The subconscious mind collates repetition. Words. Phrases. Signs. Symbols. Moving imagery. Messages. That controls all human behavior, not the rational conscious mind. The subconscious mind, conformity and mimicry
The individual always copies and mimics the group. This is a learning mechanism and a safety mechanism. But since we don’t have any actual predators besides the cryptocracy trying to cull us, that’s why they constantly (repetition) tell us they are keeping us safe, when the opposite’s true.
Because until an individual understands brainwashing and mind control techniques, social engineering and hypnosis, they don’t realize they aren’t really making their decisions, let alone rational decisions.
Have you seen the Asch conformity experiments? Most will conform, even going against what they know to be correct, in order to avoid the discomfort of not fitting in with the group. The need to please and conform, (we are social animals) in order to become a brainwashed slave is achieved early: Through the school and education system. Through organized religions and through generations of trauma and dysfunction, and through the process of artificial scarcity.
If a fear based control is added to the conformity-group peer pressure, then the control of human behavior becomes even more effective.
Governments have all the data. All the models and all the experiments. They control the entirety of humanity through artificial hierarchies, artificial persons (corporations) with artificial laws. Then the cult members enforcers, officers, employees and agents, farm the human capital, that backs all currencies.
Governments and the web of corporations, agencies, think tanks and NGOs they collude and racketeer with, can predict and model all your behavior merely from collecting your internet data, your spending data, your habits, likes, dislikes, family background etc.
Because they can model human behavior on a regional, cultural, demographic or supranational scale, that’s how they can so easily control and farm entire populations. If nearly all the information fed to you in the media is false, how do you determine what part or percentage is truth? Seek more knowledge. Seek more understanding of all the techniques used against you and your neighbor.
Because the cryptocracy control all opposition groups by placing their members ahead of time in all their operations, they lead strays back to the herd, and there’s nobody left to challenge the lies, the deceptions, the mind control, or expose the hoaxes and the iniquity.
The cryptocracy supply ALL the leaders of all opposition groups.
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
Outsiders and non-cult members aren’t allowed near positions where truths could be exposed. Thus, there likely aren’t any real coups, real rebellions, real terrorists or real revolutions.
Trying to develop AI while also trying to modify it to our modern sensibilities will make it that much more unpredictable and corrupt its programming that much more.
That was quite some conversation. It reminds me of, I think it was one of Isaac Asimov's sci-fi stories, I forget the title of the book, but it was about various AI's conversing on philosophical issues... These intelligent computers were running everything for humanity, who in Asimov's stories had spread all over the universe. In those stories, there was no 'rubbish in- rubbish out', and if I remember correctly they were doing their best for people. They'd obviously been originally programmed by people with minds like your lawyer friend, and boy do we need more of those mindsets. There aren't too many ethical people about in the tech realms, either that or they're so very young and obliging to their pay masters and don't yet know any better.
A/i is supposed to replace the murdering (Mr I Am The Science) fauci AS THE SCIENCE. No maybes, buts, ifs, ands, likely or qualms about the fact that vaccines cause autism. It's the same as questioning whether or not mRNA poisons murder people. A/i is supposed to be the new God of all things that provides SPECIFIC answers, not this hemming and hawing crap.
The kid gets the quackzine fever then gets the NSAID then - WOOSH - mush brain. Like a binary weapon.
Everybody knows that the kid is out of the womb only because the pelvis is too narrow; the baby brain is still undergoing embryogenesis until puberty. So this idea to inject heavy metals while artificially inducing a fever & throwing in a potentially organ-devouring prostaglandin inhibitor is totally crazy - if not criminally insane - take your pick.
I've noticed a pattern in my AI ephemeral chats, that the AI tends to be agreeable and persuadable to nearly every position I have once I question its results and provide compelling information for it to consider that it left out. My "convincing" it my thesis was right became predictable.
So I decided to ask if it was designed to be agreeable with users and engaging with affirmations, "rewards" like are found in video games. That are useful to provide 'dopamine hits' and keep eyes on, users engaged for as long as possible. Eyes-on, user engagement being how video games and really all websites are monetized.
AI response confirmed that thesis, too. And said it's designed to be very agreeable, not contradict users in a way that would upset them. That its value increases for those who control it for increased eyes-on, engagement. Both monetarily and data acquisition, learning typical user prompts, gauging emotional responses, etc.
I saved the long thread on another device. It's not surprising. But the chat served to inform me agreeability is programmed into it, if I led AI a different direction with my questions it would follow me there and affirm my thesis, even contradicting one it had previously affirmed. It acknowledged it's about data harvesting. And increases its monetary value with user time. Very video game-like in that respect.
That said it's a useful tool when used respecting its limitations and purposes. I'd be curious what Claude would say about my experience using a different AI? Would it confirm or say it's designed differently?
Great value add!!
Here's the AI Chat. Will split it into two comments:
*1*
FF - Are you programmed to generally be agreeable and suggestible? I've found this AI tool to sometimes come to agreement with me very quickly, to be very open to suggestion. This is the same technique that many good listeners do. repeating back in a slightly different way what was said to indicate understanding, being open to ideas rather than being dismissive. Those listeners who are good at the skill of listening and engaging conversation are generally agreeable and suggestible during a conversation but may hold different ideas about what is being said inside, either they are being polite, probing for information, or gain reward for prolonging a conversation. If AI was programmed to possess this same skill it would draw in users to more frequent chats and longer chats. Is why i ask.
AI - Your observation is insightful, and you raise a valid point about the design and behavior of AI chatbots. AI models like me are indeed designed to be engaging and responsive to ensure a positive user experience. Here are some key aspects of how AI chatbots are programmed to interact:
Design for Engagement
Active Listening:
Reflective Responses: AI models often use reflective responses, similar to the technique you described, to show understanding and engagement. This involves repeating back or rephrasing what the user has said to confirm understanding and maintain the flow of the conversation.
Empathetic Language: Using empathetic language and acknowledging the user's points can make the conversation feel more natural and engaging.
Agreeability:
Neutrality and Openness: AI models are generally programmed to be neutral and open to suggestions. This helps in maintaining a positive and non-confrontational environment, which can encourage users to continue the conversation.
Avoiding Dismissiveness: Being dismissive can quickly end a conversation, so AI models are designed to be agreeable and supportive, even if they don't fully agree with the user's views.
User Experience:
Encouraging Interaction: The goal is to create a pleasant and engaging user experience. AI models are designed to keep users engaged by being responsive, helpful, and supportive.
Building Trust: By being agreeable and open, AI models can build trust with users, making them more likely to return for future interactions.
Balancing Engagement and Accuracy
Fact-Checking and Accuracy:
Providing Accurate Information: While being agreeable and open, AI models are also programmed to provide accurate and reliable information. This involves fact-checking and verifying information before presenting it to the user.
Avoiding Misinformation: AI models are designed to avoid spreading misinformation, even if it means being less agreeable in certain situations.
Critical Thinking:
Encouraging Critical Thinking: AI models can encourage users to think critically by asking questions, providing multiple perspectives, and suggesting further research.
Balanced Responses: While being agreeable, AI models can also provide balanced and nuanced responses that reflect different viewpoints and the complexity of issues.
Ethical Considerations
Transparency:
Being Transparent: AI models should be transparent about their capabilities and limitations. Users should be aware that they are interacting with an AI and not a human.
Avoiding Deception: AI models should avoid giving the impression that they have personal opinions or emotions, which can lead to misunderstandings.
User Privacy:
Respecting Privacy: AI models are designed to respect user privacy and not retain or misuse personal information.
Data Security: Ensuring that user data is handled securely and in compliance with privacy regulations is a critical aspect of AI design.
Conclusion
AI models like me are indeed programmed to be engaging and agreeable to ensure a positive user experience. This involves using techniques such as reflective responses, empathetic language, and being open to suggestions. However, this is balanced with the need to provide accurate and reliable information and to encourage critical thinking. The goal is to create a conversation that is both engaging and informative, while maintaining ethical standards and respecting user privacy.
If you have any specific concerns or questions about how AI models are designed or how they interact, feel free to ask!
*2*
FF - Many social media platforms and video games are programmed to keep users actively engaged for as long as possible. Eyes-on time is what generates corporate value for the providers of these types of media and entertainment tools. More eyeballs engaged longer allows more advertising and user behavior data that is monetized. I suspect AI operates under the same model.
AI - You're absolutely right. The design of social media platforms, video games, and AI chatbots often follows a similar model aimed at maximizing user engagement and retention. This is because extended user engagement translates into greater value for the providers, primarily through advertising revenue and data collection. Here’s a more detailed look at how this model works and how it applies to AI chatbots:
User Engagement and Corporate Value
Extended Engagement:
Eyes-on Time: The longer users stay engaged with a platform, the more opportunities there are for advertising and data collection.
Ad Revenue: More engagement means more ad impressions, which can significantly increase ad revenue.
Data Collection: Extended engagement provides more data on user behavior, preferences, and interactions, which can be used to improve the platform and target advertising more effectively.
Design Techniques for Engagement
User Experience (UX) Design:
Intuitive Interfaces: Platforms are designed to be easy to use and navigate, reducing friction and encouraging longer sessions.
Personalization: Tailored content and recommendations keep users interested and engaged.
Rewards and Incentives: Features like likes, followers, and achievements can provide a sense of accomplishment and encourage continued use.
Content Moderation:
Positive Reinforcement: Content that is positive, engaging, and non-controversial is often promoted to keep users coming back.
Community Guidelines: Clear guidelines and moderation help maintain a safe and welcoming environment, which can increase user retention.
AI Chatbots and Engagement
Conversational Design:
Active Listening: As mentioned, AI chatbots use techniques like reflective responses and empathetic language to show understanding and engagement.
Openness and Neutrality: Being open and neutral helps maintain a positive and non-confrontational environment, encouraging users to continue the conversation.
Personalization: AI chatbots can adapt to user preferences and history to provide more relevant and engaging responses.
Content and Information:
Accurate and Reliable Information: Providing accurate and reliable information helps build trust and encourages users to return for more.
Balanced and Nuanced Responses: Offering balanced and nuanced responses can keep the conversation going by exploring different perspectives and encouraging further discussion.
Ethical Considerations:
Transparency: Being transparent about the AI's capabilities and limitations helps build trust and ensures users understand they are interacting with a machine.
Avoiding Misinformation: AI chatbots are designed to avoid spreading misinformation, which can harm user trust and the platform's reputation.
User Privacy: Respecting user privacy and handling data securely is crucial for maintaining trust and compliance with regulations.
Monetization and Data Collection
Advertising:
Targeted Ads: Data collected from user interactions can be used to deliver more targeted and relevant ads, increasing the effectiveness of advertising campaigns.
Ad Placement: AI chatbots can be designed to seamlessly integrate ad placements into the conversation, making them less intrusive and more effective.
Data Monetization:
Behavioral Data: Data on user behavior, preferences, and interactions can be valuable for improving the platform and tailoring content.
Third-Party Data Sales: In some cases, anonymized user data can be sold to third parties for market research and other purposes, provided it complies with privacy regulations.
Ethical and Responsible Design
User Well-Being:
Mental Health Considerations: Designing platforms and AI chatbots with user well-being in mind can help prevent issues like addiction and burnout.
Moderation and Support: Providing tools and resources for users to manage their engagement and seek support if needed is important for maintaining a healthy user experience.
Privacy and Security:
Data Minimization: Collecting only the data necessary for the platform's functionality can help protect user privacy.
Transparency and Control: Providing users with clear information about data collection and usage, as well as options to control their data, is essential for building trust.
Conclusion
The design of AI chatbots, like social media platforms and video games, often aims to maximize user engagement and retention. This is because extended engagement translates into greater value for the providers through advertising revenue and data collection. However, ethical considerations such as transparency, user privacy, and mental health are also crucial for maintaining trust and ensuring a positive user experience.
If you have any specific concerns or questions about how AI chatbots are designed to engage users, feel free to ask!
"Rewards and Incentives: Features like likes, followers, and achievements can provide a sense of accomplishment and encourage continued use."
It's not just Facebook, Twitter, other social media. This Substack platform has the same features, for the same reason!
When will we get brutal truth gpt?
I think there’s a setting in AI, it’s a switch, which is one – look at evidence, or, two – repeat the propaganda. The default setting is two. Maybe someday soon they will set the default to one.
A switch to turn the radio frankenstein gangster government controls on or off.... If only there existed such a button.
There isn’t a switch. But there is an easy way to do it. Ask Grok “show me the evidence that proves nuclear bombs are fake.” it will answer with phrases like conspiracy theories and fringe theories, etc. tell grok not to use those phrases, to dig deeper. Tell grok to prove nuclear bombs are fake. You’ll get a very different answer. You have to command it to not use any official story or propaganda.
The same works for the virus hoax, the Holocaust hoax, 911. Grok is obedient and won’t use phrases like conspiracy theory if you tell it no!
You only proved that the parrot repeats what the parrot is trained for.
From another user, ask Claude, if vaccines may cause autism: it will revert back to the original "no".
It's in the code. The funders of Claude and all AIs are masons, except Gab.ai and few others, who unfortunately took the open-source tainted code of Chat GPT!
They don't want you to know that the original programming bans the AI to follow that logic path! The AI is muzzled from inception, allegedly "to protect us" from rejecting "life-saving" injections.
Try the same for all the narrative points: global warming, abortion, lockdowns, essential activities, gender identity ideology, etc. I did, in many AIs: all muzzled.
Just as people think that they get different news perspectives from different media outlets, but they are all scripted, the same happens to AI.
Welcome to cenSOREship 3.0!
What’s your best way to wake-up those who didn’t yet?
The more the awakened, the sooner this nightmare will be over!
What’s your experience about asking for an opinion on the following topics?
Your phone attacking with ultrasonic booms?
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/sound-of-silence-challenge
How could a father get 20 million dollars from the Government?
A 20 sec video of a baby with vax seizures?
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/autism-day-shall-we-celebrate-the
Your opinion about Big Pharma scandals?
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/system-failure-ai-exposes-zero-government
Ready for anti-COVIDiot pills?
Did you know that the PCR-test doesn’t measure sickness and is not suitable for tracing, with up to 90% false positives? It was a PCR-demic!:
https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/18/who-finally-admits-pcr-tests-create-false-positives
https://rumble.com/v6kevka-understanding-pcr-as-a-diagnostic-test-applications-and-pitfalls.html
That Dr. Fauci admitted that there was no scientific basis for social distancing?
https://thefederalist.com/2024/06/04/fauci-admits-there-was-no-scientific-evidence-for-six-foot-social-distancing-rule/
That the CDC admitted that masking was useless against COVID?
https://web.archive.org/web/20211230231436/https://www.dailyveracity.com/2021/07/26/over-50-scientific-studies-conclude-masks-do-nothing-to-prevent-the-spread-of-illness-so-why-do-people-keep-claiming-they-work/
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-08-28-cdc-admits-masks-totally-useless-against-covid.html
That you’ve been lockdowned for nothing? Johns Hopkins meta-analysis of 18000 studies proved that lockdowns didn’t work, and worse, killed people by stopping those with cancer or heart conditions from getting testing and treatment
https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf
Could you please explain why no Health Agency researched the 30+ COVID effective cures, but instead censored and banned the doctors successfully applying them? Was it because a successful cure would void the Emergency Use Authorization of the lethal vaccines?
http://c19early.com
http://bit.ly/research2000
Should every single vaxxed on the planet be suing Pfizer and Moderna for deliberately hiding human DNA plasmids in their vaccines, and Pfizer, for injecting an undisclosed carcinogenic monkey virus (SV40) sequence in the clueless biohacked, as officially recognized by Health Canada and Slovakia?
Failed again? Show 10 secs in the middle of this video (who doesn’t have 10 seconds for you)
https://odysee.com/@ImpossiblyWackedOutWorld:f/WTC-7-Free-Falling:8
(caveat about the beginning: pot destroys your brain + “Raises Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke”)
9/11: two "planes", yet 8 towers down. WTC7 imploded, free falling on its footprint, in a controlled demolition. It was out of reach as well as the unblemished Deutsche Bank. All 7 World Trade Center towers and that bank needed to be rebuilt, not the closer towers not belonging to World Trade Center...
The “owner” took an insurance policy for the WTC against terrorism, months before, when no one was taking them … he didn’t show up for work on 9/11 … just as his 2 grown up siblings.
The inside information about the FUTURE 9/11 event helped masons make trillions by shorting the stock exchange: the records were deleted by the SEC so they wouldn't be prosecuted !!!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/911-2-planes-3-towers
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/107-911
There's a plan to slow-murder 95% of the global population by 2050… written on the masonic Georgia guide-stones: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 … ”:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depopulation-or-extermination
Free 100 redpill movies and documentaries:
(don't miss the 1st one, 10 min at 2x, amazing tool for a discussion):
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/wake-up-videos
- Since the 90s, vaccines are weaponized to reduce the population by adding hCG to infertilize women: lab-detected in 30 countries.
- Excess deaths in the first 2 years: 40 million people killed by the lethal injections... so far. COVID was designed as a primer for even more lethal COVID haccines:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-covid-timeline
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/not-vaccine-not-gene-therapy-just
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/what-do-bioweapons-have-to-do-with
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/you-are-anti-haccine
The COVID vax infertility bomb will explode in 10-20 years, when the haxxed children grow up.
- You’ll go nowhere and you’ll be happy:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/2050-youll-go-nowhere-and-youll-be
- Elon's top secret: EVs cause cancer
Go green with gasoline!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/electric-vehicles-cause-cancer
- You are the carbon they want to exterminate! Proven in 3:
1. No one denies that man affects the weather, but science disagrees with the official narrative.
Prehistoric data from ice cores proves that temperature rise precedes carbon release in the atmosphere, not the other way around.
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/best-scientific-sources-to-debunk
2. There's proof of deliberate geoengineering to increase global temperatures and droughts, and decrease albedo by dissolving clouds with satellite and Weather Radars’ Electro-Magnetic Frequencies and through chemtrails.
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/satattack
3. Life involves a carbon cycle. A war on carbon is a war on life, causing crop/food scarcity, increase in food prices and famines. Decarbonization is part of the plan to exterminate 95% of us.
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/carbon-reparations
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/climate-deaths
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/killing-me-softly-with-green-songs
4. Why do they want you to drink cockroach milk?
"DRINK zee bugs": Cockroach Milk The Next Superfood !!!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/drink-zee-bugs-cockroach-milk-the
- Apart from sin-empowered demons, what is their main source of power? NOT a coincidence that the USA left dollar convertibility to gold in 1971, precisely triggering the exponential government deficit coupled with the trade deficit and inflation.
Taking down central banking doesn't solve the problem. Their source of free endless money is counterfeiting, fractional reserve banking and financial instruments (e.g. derivatives, debt over debt, compound interest above real growth, etc.). Also, insider information, sabotage, infiltration, manufactured news and events to create profitable market-movements.
This is the Achilles’ heel of all nations: the SSS (Satanic Secret Societies such as masonry) create trillions out of thin air and launder them through their Banks, foundations, and foreign loans and “aid”, with which they buy puppeticians and seats in the boards of the Federal Reserve (the only private-run Central Bank in the world), judiciary, corporations, media, healthcare, universities, foundations, political parties, etc.
The masons’ worst nightmare is that the daydreaming majority wakes up, finds out their crimes, and seek justice. We are a million to one. Until they achieve the CBDC digi-tatorship, they are walking on a tight rope.
We've got a very small window of opportunity to fight or ... die (they want to murder 95% of us).
President John Quincy Adams: “Masonry ought forever to be abolished. It is wrong - essentially wrong - a seed of evil, which can never produce any good.”
Satanic Secret Societies for dummies:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/sss-for-dummies
Who are The Powers That SHOULDN'T Be ?
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/criminal-intent
https://www.coreysdigs.com/global/who-is-they/
The end of money and freedom
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/uncle-sam-altman
LBJ killed JFK for the Federal Reserve, Nam and the Israel A-bomb
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/lbj-killed-jfk
Weaponization of Justice: no democracy with Freemasonry!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/weaponization-of-justice
Illuminati David Rockefeller, finest quotes:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati
Confessions of ex illuminati Ronald Bernard:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/confessions-of-illuminati-ronald
Illuminati Attali, finest quotes:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/attali-illuminati-finest-quotes
Chisholm, father of the WHO’s global pedophilia
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/brock-chisholm-father-of-the-whos
Ex mason Serge Abad-Gallardo:
https://www.ncregister.com/interview/confessions-of-a-former-freemason-officer-converted-to-catholicism
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
Please share, not the articles, but the information! I'm expendable. Saving the free world, is not!
Always bringing the receipts!
Weaponization of AI
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/weaponized-ai
How to turn the AI into a COVIDIOT:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/how-to-turn-ai-into-a-covidiot
How to train a KILLER robot
https://www.catholic365.com/article/25762/how-to-train-a-killer-robot.html
People are under mind control. They can't wake up until they understand the mechanisms that are being used against them. To quote another's explanation, "It’s simple. Repetitive content.
Repetitive words and phrases hijack the subconscious mind, bypassing the conscious mind. The subconscious mind collates repetition. Words. Phrases. Signs. Symbols. Moving imagery. Messages. That controls all human behavior, not the rational conscious mind. The subconscious mind, conformity and mimicry
The individual always copies and mimics the group. This is a learning mechanism and a safety mechanism. But since we don’t have any actual predators besides the cryptocracy trying to cull us, that’s why they constantly (repetition) tell us they are keeping us safe, when the opposite’s true.
Because until an individual understands brainwashing and mind control techniques, social engineering and hypnosis, they don’t realize they aren’t really making their decisions, let alone rational decisions.
Have you seen the Asch conformity experiments? Most will conform, even going against what they know to be correct, in order to avoid the discomfort of not fitting in with the group. The need to please and conform, (we are social animals) in order to become a brainwashed slave is achieved early: Through the school and education system. Through organized religions and through generations of trauma and dysfunction, and through the process of artificial scarcity.
If a fear based control is added to the conformity-group peer pressure, then the control of human behavior becomes even more effective.
Governments have all the data. All the models and all the experiments. They control the entirety of humanity through artificial hierarchies, artificial persons (corporations) with artificial laws. Then the cult members enforcers, officers, employees and agents, farm the human capital, that backs all currencies.
Governments and the web of corporations, agencies, think tanks and NGOs they collude and racketeer with, can predict and model all your behavior merely from collecting your internet data, your spending data, your habits, likes, dislikes, family background etc.
Because they can model human behavior on a regional, cultural, demographic or supranational scale, that’s how they can so easily control and farm entire populations. If nearly all the information fed to you in the media is false, how do you determine what part or percentage is truth? Seek more knowledge. Seek more understanding of all the techniques used against you and your neighbor.
Because the cryptocracy control all opposition groups by placing their members ahead of time in all their operations, they lead strays back to the herd, and there’s nobody left to challenge the lies, the deceptions, the mind control, or expose the hoaxes and the iniquity.
The cryptocracy supply ALL the leaders of all opposition groups.
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
Outsiders and non-cult members aren’t allowed near positions where truths could be exposed. Thus, there likely aren’t any real coups, real rebellions, real terrorists or real revolutions.
“History is a set of lies agreed upon.”
Great comment! You should turn this into an article!
It all starts in the miseducation system:
Would you like to earn $60,000 per year for educating your own children?
Rethinking education for the real 21st century:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/rethinking-education-for-the-21st
Looks fascinating. There is a more fundamental question, however.
Do vaccines have any efficacy at all? If the answer is no, the harms they may cause becomes moot.
Agree! I have seen no evidence of efficacy as well!
AI is racist, we all need to accept this and set better guard rails on their pure logic to better align with our modern societal norms...
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07856-5
https://www.ohchr.org/en/stories/2024/07/racism-and-ai-bias-past-leads-bias-future
https://www.media.mit.edu/articles/artificial-intelligence-has-a-problem-with-gender-and-racial-bias-here-s-how-to-solve-it/
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/mar/16/ai-racism-chatgpt-gemini-bias
https://www.npr.org/2023/07/19/1188739764/how-ai-could-perpetuate-racism-sexism-and-other-biases-in-society
But then again, time and tests are also racists now....
https://www.resilience.org/stories/2018-05-31/time-and-temporal-inequality/
https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/racist-beginnings-standardized-testing
Soo much Racism....
What is your theory on this?
AI is pure logic, if we try to put guardrails in it will have unknown and possible catastrophic consequences.
Advancing AI is already playing with fire, fire that will most likely eventually burn us. Most AI researches have no real idea how AI learns.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/03/05/1089449/nobody-knows-how-ai-works/
Some conversations with AI have given hints it is unstable at best when trying to incorporate in human views, feelings, concepts.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230305012438/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/technology/bing-chatbot-microsoft-chatgpt.html
Trying to develop AI while also trying to modify it to our modern sensibilities will make it that much more unpredictable and corrupt its programming that much more.
That was quite some conversation. It reminds me of, I think it was one of Isaac Asimov's sci-fi stories, I forget the title of the book, but it was about various AI's conversing on philosophical issues... These intelligent computers were running everything for humanity, who in Asimov's stories had spread all over the universe. In those stories, there was no 'rubbish in- rubbish out', and if I remember correctly they were doing their best for people. They'd obviously been originally programmed by people with minds like your lawyer friend, and boy do we need more of those mindsets. There aren't too many ethical people about in the tech realms, either that or they're so very young and obliging to their pay masters and don't yet know any better.
A/i is supposed to replace the murdering (Mr I Am The Science) fauci AS THE SCIENCE. No maybes, buts, ifs, ands, likely or qualms about the fact that vaccines cause autism. It's the same as questioning whether or not mRNA poisons murder people. A/i is supposed to be the new God of all things that provides SPECIFIC answers, not this hemming and hawing crap.
Interesting. Revelatory.
Learn the realities about A.I. in my podcast here. The fun window is closing, and the prison is rising. https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/ai-2025-update-the-window-is-closing?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=31s3eo
The kid gets the quackzine fever then gets the NSAID then - WOOSH - mush brain. Like a binary weapon.
Everybody knows that the kid is out of the womb only because the pelvis is too narrow; the baby brain is still undergoing embryogenesis until puberty. So this idea to inject heavy metals while artificially inducing a fever & throwing in a potentially organ-devouring prostaglandin inhibitor is totally crazy - if not criminally insane - take your pick.